Archive | Uncategorized

Webinar: How to Practice Patent Law After Alice

A recording of this webinar is available online. The PowerPoint presentation for this webinar is posted here: How to Practice Patent Law After Alice John Kong’s paper is posted here:  Surviving Alice Gone Wild 12-09-2014 Presented by the IP Legal Network, this free webinar on December 9, 2014, at 1 pm EST, will provide practical […]

Continue Reading

Inadequate Infringement Contentions Are Struck

Because of insufficiencies in a plaintiff’s infringement contentions, a plaintiff was precluded from asserting the doctrine of equivalents (DOE) concerning any claim, and was also precluded from asserting any infringement with respect to one means-plus-function claim. Dynetix Design Solutions v. Synopsys, Inc., No. C 11-5973 PSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2013). Regarding the doctrine of […]

Continue Reading

Functional Language Can Have Patentable Weight

The Federal Circuit has held that functional language in a software claim should be given patentable weight.  In re Jasinski, No. 2012-1482 (Feb. 15, 2013). Accordingly, the Court reversed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s rejection of claims as allegedly anticipated.  If applied to claims in other software patents and patent applications, this decision, although […]

Continue Reading

Estoppel and Inter Partes Review of Patent Validity

Do the estoppel provisions of the inter partes re-examination statute preclude a third party from relying on prior art in litigation where, after the third party has included the prior art in its request for inter partes re-examination, the USPTO has determined that the prior art does not present a substantial new question of patentability? […]

Continue Reading

Claims for Vicarious Liability for Direct Patent Infringement Dismissed (But Claims for Direct Infringement Were Adequately Pled)

Allegations that the popular Slingbox device directly infringes two patents satisfied Form 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and thus survived a motion to dismiss.  Joao Control and Monitoring Systems of California LLC v. Sling Media Inc., No. C-11-6277 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012).  However, the plaintiff’s allegations that Sling Media was […]

Continue Reading

Settlement Agreement Does Not Prevent Suit Against Microsoft Customers

There is a reason why parties negotiating settlement agreements in patent cases often devote considerable time and energy to negotiating language covering use of patented technology by the licensee’s customers and downstream users.  Despite, or perhaps because of, this attention, disputes sometimes arise.  Illustratively, Microsoft was recently denied summary judgment on its claim that Eolas […]

Continue Reading

Check Fraud Prevention Patent Passes Bilski Test

Saying the issue was a “close call,” a Missouri court has ruled that method and apparatus claims directed to using encrypted codes to prevent check fraud are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc., No. 4:07CV185 (E.D. Mo. May 15, 2012).  The question came before the Court on the […]

Continue Reading

Notes on the New Detroit Patent Office

This article was originally published in the May 7, 2012, issue of the Michigan Lawyers Weekly.  Here is a link to my previous comment on the Detroit Patent Office. In July, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will open a branch office in downtown Detroit.  You may have heard a year or so ago […]

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes