Medical Method Claims Recite Patentable Subject Matter, Prometheus Notwithstanding

Patent claims directed to a method for choosing an immunization schedule recite patentable subject matter even in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012), according to the District Court in Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen Idec, No. WDQ-04-2607 (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2012).  The […]

Read full story

Software Can Be a “Good” under the California UCC

Sale of a software license constituted sale of a “good” for purposes of applying the California UCC.  Gross v. Symantec Corp., No. C 12-00154 CRB (N.D. Cal. July 31, 2012).  A putative class action plaintiff sued Symantec, alleging that a free trial for its software “was essentially a scam, and that the software does not […]

Read full story

Are Links on a Social Network Contributory Copyright Infringement?

Because it was not satisfied that a social network, hosting links to copyrighted videos, was a contributory infringer, the Seventh Circuit has vacated a preliminary injunction against the social network.  Flava Works, Inc. v. Gunter, No. 11-3190 (7th Cir. Aug. 2, 2012).  According to Judge Posner’s opinion for the court, even if the defendant, myVidster, […]

Read full story

Prior Art Publications Are Presumed to Be Enabling

The presumption that a prior art reference is enabled applies to printed publications in addition to patents, the Federal Circuit has explained in In re Antor Media Corp., No. 2011-1465 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2012).  Further, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences and upheld rejections issued in a re-examination of […]

Read full story

No Joinder Under AIA Just Because Accused Smartphones All Use Android

Different manufacturers’ use of the Android operating system in their respective smartphones did not arise out of the “same transaction or occurrence” under the joinder provision of the America Invents Act, 35 U.S.C. § 299.  Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple Inc., nos. 1:12-cv-20271-RNS and 1:10-cv-23580-RNS, (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2012).  Accordingly, the court granted defendant […]

Read full story

Pre-Suit Publicity Not Enough to Plead Willful Patent Infringement

The plaintiff in Softview, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Civ. No. 10-389-LPS (D. Del. July 26, 2012), successfully pled willful patent infringement against some defendants, but not others.  Publicity about a patent is not enough from which to infer the pre-suit knowledge that is a prerequisite to willfulness, but such knowledge might be inferred from activities […]

Read full story

Patent-Eligibility Decision Considers CLS Bank and Bancorp

In denying the plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of summary judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the Court in Digitech Information Systems, Inc. v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, No. 6:10-cv-1373 (M.D. Fla. July 30, 3012), compared the claim at issue to the claims held not patent-eligible in the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in […]

Read full story

Insurance Valuation Patent Claims Invalid Under Section 101

The Federal Circuit has upheld a District Court decision invalidating, as patent-ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, patent claims directed to calculating an amount that a third-party guarantor must pay based on market and book values of an insurance policy in the event the policy is paid out prematurely.  Bancorp Services, LLC. v. Sun Life […]

Read full story

Plaintiff Must Identify Software Trade Secrets

Here is a reminder that plaintiffs have an obligation to identify allegedly stolen trade secrets.  In MSCI, Inc. v. Jacob, 945 N.Y.S.2d 863 (April 20, 2012), a New York state court held that the plaintiffs were required to affirmatively identify features of their software that included trade secrets, rather than simply identify aspects of the […]

Read full story

Discovery Not Limited to Patent Infringement Contentions

Because the Eastern District of Texas does not limit the scope of discovery to the plaintiff’s infringement contentions, the court in DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, No. 2:06-CV-42-JRG (E.D. Texas, July 18, 2012), granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel one of the defendants to produce a corporate representative to testify regarding various of that defendant’s […]

Read full story