Telephone Transaction Data Claims Not Patent-Eligible

Claims directed to storing transaction data captured via a telephone are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101, says a Delaware District Court.  Cyberfone Sys. LLC v. Cellco Partnership, Civ. Nos. 11-827-SLR, 11-829-SLR, 11-831-SLR (D. Del. Aug. 16, 2012).  Accordingly, the court granted summary judgment of invalidity in favor of the defendants concerning U.S. Patent No. […]

Read full story

Functional Language Renders Claims Indefinite

Patent claims broadly reciting functions of a “controller” are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, according to the court in Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher, Ltd., Civil No. 07-cv-00006-PB (D. N.H. Aug. 9, 2012).  The court therefore granted accused infringer Markem’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity. A representative patent claim recited a tape […]

Read full story

The America Invents Act for Non-Patent Lawyers

The America Invents Act, as every patent lawyer knows, makes significant changes to the practice of patent law in the United States.  Especially if you are not a patent lawyer, you may find helpful my recent article,  “Some Basics of the America Invents Act for Non-Patent Lawyers,” published in the August 2012 issue of the […]

Read full story

Claims for Vicarious Liability for Direct Patent Infringement Dismissed (But Claims for Direct Infringement Were Adequately Pled)

Allegations that the popular Slingbox device directly infringes two patents satisfied Form 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and thus survived a motion to dismiss.  Joao Control and Monitoring Systems of California LLC v. Sling Media Inc., No. C-11-6277 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012).  However, the plaintiff’s allegations that Sling Media was […]

Read full story

Medical Method Claims Recite Patentable Subject Matter, Prometheus Notwithstanding

Patent claims directed to a method for choosing an immunization schedule recite patentable subject matter even in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012), according to the District Court in Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen Idec, No. WDQ-04-2607 (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2012).  The […]

Read full story

Software Can Be a “Good” under the California UCC

Sale of a software license constituted sale of a “good” for purposes of applying the California UCC.  Gross v. Symantec Corp., No. C 12-00154 CRB (N.D. Cal. July 31, 2012).  A putative class action plaintiff sued Symantec, alleging that a free trial for its software “was essentially a scam, and that the software does not […]

Read full story

Are Links on a Social Network Contributory Copyright Infringement?

Because it was not satisfied that a social network, hosting links to copyrighted videos, was a contributory infringer, the Seventh Circuit has vacated a preliminary injunction against the social network.  Flava Works, Inc. v. Gunter, No. 11-3190 (7th Cir. Aug. 2, 2012).  According to Judge Posner’s opinion for the court, even if the defendant, myVidster, […]

Read full story

Prior Art Publications Are Presumed to Be Enabling

The presumption that a prior art reference is enabled applies to printed publications in addition to patents, the Federal Circuit has explained in In re Antor Media Corp., No. 2011-1465 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2012).  Further, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences and upheld rejections issued in a re-examination of […]

Read full story

No Joinder Under AIA Just Because Accused Smartphones All Use Android

Different manufacturers’ use of the Android operating system in their respective smartphones did not arise out of the “same transaction or occurrence” under the joinder provision of the America Invents Act, 35 U.S.C. § 299.  Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple Inc., nos. 1:12-cv-20271-RNS and 1:10-cv-23580-RNS, (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2012).  Accordingly, the court granted defendant […]

Read full story

Pre-Suit Publicity Not Enough to Plead Willful Patent Infringement

The plaintiff in Softview, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Civ. No. 10-389-LPS (D. Del. July 26, 2012), successfully pled willful patent infringement against some defendants, but not others.  Publicity about a patent is not enough from which to infer the pre-suit knowledge that is a prerequisite to willfulness, but such knowledge might be inferred from activities […]

Read full story